Two lead changes, an unknown player emerging to ignite a slumbering Seahawks offense, Tom Brady and his Patriots overcoming a 10 point fourth quarter deficit, and a potential game wining march in the final minute of regulation all made for one of the best Super Bowls in recent memory, ending in a 28 24 New England victory. The game also provided, until a fist fight fueled by frustration broke out in the final seconds at least, a relatively respectable cap to the most bizarre and humiliating lead up to a championship game that the NFL has ever seen.
Drawing on the recent concussion litigation from the United States’ National Football League (NFL) the paper examines the emergence of neuroscience knowledge as part of http://www.cheapraybans2013.com/ a defining justification of the lawsuit. The paper argues that neuroscience knowledge is best understood as custom football jerseys for sale a regulatory discourse that is attached to larger social, political, and economic realities that bring it into being as a legitimate type of knowledge. This larger socio political governance logic is one that scholars call ‘biopolitical’ which emphasizes the protection of individual life over and above other ways of being. Risk discourses that frame risk taking practices as immoral thus emerge within this biopolitical regime of governance that frame morality in terms of public health that individual citizens ought to pursue. With this in mind neuroscience knowledge plays an important role in concussion litigation. It emerges as replica jerseys a technology of biopolitical governance in that it is used to justify legal decisions on concussion. This is despite basketball jerseys the fact that neuroscience knowledge remains nascent and even scientifically uncertain. Because of buy nfl jerseys this, the paper argues that scholars ought to not only consider neuroscience research skeptically, but also ought to be aware of the dangers of neuroscience’s emergence as an ‘anticipatory discourse’ that has the potential to reduce human behaviour to matters of the brain that thus transforms our very ontology of ourselves and the practices we perceive as ‘good’.
NFLPA is reviewing the decision and considering all options, the players union said in a statement Thursday. appellate court decision focuses on the jurisdictional issues. The failures of due process by the NFL articulated in the District Court decision were not addressed. most likely destination for further legal challenges from players union attorneys representing Elliott is with the Southern District generic nfl jerseys of New York. The NFL filed in that federal court after Elliott appeal through the league was denied by arbitrator Harold Henderson last month cheap ray ban sungalsses.